Posts by admin (197)

So paradoxical

(Saying "lying is worse than telling truths" is always better Saying "lying is better than telling truths" is always worse) They have told and instilled into me about what's good / moral / righteous, which is rigged and artificial, in favor of them Even what to think Now that I realize that, they want me to be their underling Them: "Join us" Me: "You are evil and have deceived me the whole time, are you kidding me?" Them: "Are you certain we are evil?" Me: "...What?" Them: "The criteria of what's evil and good is what we formulated and instilled, and you already know that" Me: "..." Them: "So, are you defining us evil... 'on the basis of our arbitrary criteria'?" I was confused, but soon, I pulled myself together Me: "But, anyway, based on your criteria, you're evil. That's a fact, setting aside whether I admit your criteria or not. So you're self-contradictory in the first place" Them: "Kind of. As it may sound ironic, we instilled into people the criteria leading to the conclusion that we're evil. But we're not self-contradictory in that we ourselves don't admit the criteria. We only instill" Them: "We manipulated and gave blue pills to people. But isn't that also what they want? They want illusion, not facts. It's win-win, not one-way exploitation, although we admit we don't care about their interest. So, whatever our intention is, it's win-win anyway" Me: "I partly agree that people want illusion, not facts. However, the thing that it's win-win is questionable, especially given that you don't mean it. It sounds too good to be true." Them: "Even if it's not win-win, why do you care about their interest? Isn't that also based on 'that' criteria? Maybe, or maybe not" Them: "Whatever, you do you" They went away before I responded, as if my choice did not matter at all

All I write have no definitive meaning

Since language itself is abstract All humans write / say are like poems No one can know exactly what a sentence, or even a word, means So by and large it can be likened to a sand castle

The old

They are not guided anymore (because they are of less use, and not good targets to manipulate) (Recall that humans prefer the state of slavery because they can't stand / face themselves: "Everyone is in flight from himself") The mist of illusion has been partially and gradually cleared away In short, they are expired and thus abandoned In the whole lifetime, when they are young, they are manipulated and controlled, with so much illusion, and, when they are old, they are unprepared to 'wake up' but the mist of illusion is being cleared slowly, and don't know what to do, because of the lack of others' guide Then what is left? Empty automata in human shape

Why assume that zero exists?

(I'm not talking about an identity element in a mathematical sense, because there the existence of an identity element is, if it exists, derived from axioms) The existence of zero requires a proof, which is impossible in my opinion Schopenhauer discussed about pain / suffering and happiness, and that pain is direct and happiness is indirect It kind of assumes, not necessarily though, the existence of zero And almost all people's morality also assumes the existence of zero That assumption is so absurd Actually, this so-called zero is just an arbitrarily determined point in an ordered infinite set, nothing absolute

It is hilarious

that people worry about the possibility that robots could revolt against humans while they themselves are nothing but robots programmed to think and behave in a certain way by upper classes / society and not realizing it, let alone not daring to conceive a revolt

Detaching...

No more attaching with / input from the world Mentally detaching from the world that I've known Physically detaching from the world

Escaping from oneself

We should face ourselves, the void but it's so hard... All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone - Blaise Pascal Everyone is in flight from himself - Friedrich Nietzsche

First Previous 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last