Life is like a mosaic
Looking closer it is not as beautiful as in a distance
Posts by admin (197)
The worst downside of being too mentally mature is
that he can't be understood by anyone He is doomed to be misunderstood He does not belong to any social situation "I don't belong here..." Where does he belong? Nowhere but to himself
I am so surprised that
almost all people do not think about What is the purpose of life What will they do (This question is the most significant one) What to achieve in their lifetime (not just a profession) seriously They think once or twice in their 10's, but never take time to think seriously later They just live like robots, like NPCs No serious contemplation, No their own thought, just chasing after what others have established They pursue what others pursue Not takes time to think, Their pathetic brain can't handle the burden of thinking I am not bragging I am really surprised, since those questions are so 'obviously' important, I thought everyone would have thought about that seriously and had an opinion, even though that opinion could be childish But whenever I ask those questions, it becomes so obvious that they have not given a hoot about those questions Isn't it surprising? Maybe it is not surprising in the same way those questions are not important to the many
There is only one truth
And it is not "Cogito, ergo sum" (I think, therefore I am) Descartes was naive The only truth is the principle of division: We can't think without dividing What is "we"? What is "what"? The moment you define something, you must divide into [A, not A] Without division, no logical statement can even be established The moment I think something, I am dividing into something and not something Descartes, you said "I think, therefore I am"? What is I? What is think? What is therefore? What does "I am" mean? Without division, Descartes cannot answer So the principle of division is precedent, and it is the only truth Human being can't think without division, and if you argue with me with the possibility of beyond-human-being, what is the point of arguing? Arguing is humane (Russell's paradox is philosophically related to this principle) The moment I mention "truth", I am dividing "truth" and "not truth" So it is even precedent to the statement that "A is A" (which, in turn, is definitely precedent to "Cogito, ergo sum")
As we get older, we put more importance on the outside
Look at children, they are mostly happy Despite that, they sleep long Contemplate on this and once more
People decide what's right or wrong the same way they decide what's funny or not
So true Kant was wrong, or said what he didn't truly think
Absolute
Rule number one: There is no rule