There is only one truth

And it is not "Cogito, ergo sum" (I think, therefore I am) Descartes was naive The only truth is the principle of division: We can't think without dividing What is "we"? What is "what"? The moment you define something, you must divide into [A, not A] Without division, no logical statement can even be established The moment I think something, I am dividing into something and not something Descartes, you said "I think, therefore I am"? What is I? What is think? What is therefore? What does "I am" mean? Without division, Descartes cannot answer So the principle of division is precedent, and it is the only truth Human being can't think without division, and if you argue with me with the possibility of beyond-human-being, what is the point of arguing? Arguing is humane (Russell's paradox is philosophically related to this principle) The moment I mention "truth", I am dividing "truth" and "not truth" So it is even precedent to the statement that "A is A" (which, in turn, is definitely precedent to "Cogito, ergo sum")